Temperature and rainfall are critical factors in determining Malaria
patterns. Climate change will increase the opportunities for malaria
transmission in traditionally malarious areas, in areas were the disease has
been controlled, and in new areas previously unaffected by malaria. Higher
temperatures are both lethal and beneficial to Plasmodium and it’s vector.
Regions where temperatures are close to the physiological tolerance of the
parasite and mosquito can lead to decreased transmission if temperatures rose.
However, the increased temperature in temperate regions would increase the risk
of transmission to a greater extent because warmer temperatures alter the
growth cycle of the parasite and the mosquito, enabling them to develop faster
and earlier. Any change in precipitation to either extremes will also increase
malaria transmission. Increased rainfall associated with El Nino can flood
areas that are usually dry. In dry climates, heavy intermittent rainfall can
provide good breeding conditions for mosquitoes. However, the opposite scenario
is also true in that drought has been identified as a factor contributing to
increased malaria mortality and transmission due to drought-related
malnutrition in humans and better breeding conditions, respectively. Drought
may turn rivers into strings of pools, which are the preferred breeding grounds
for mosquitoes.
Many tropical countries such as
those in South America and Africa experienced malaria epidemics following El
Nino years by mechanisms mentioned above in regards to temperature change and
precipitation. The relationship between El Nino and the malaria epidemics, is
again, statistically significant. Transmission rates up to 40% have even been
seen following El Nino associated heavy rainfall and flooding. Climate change increases
the epidemic potential of malaria in tropical countries. The increasing
temperatures will reintroduce or increase transmission of malaria in tropical
and temperate regions that have eliminated or controlled transmission.
Gunnye,
ReplyDeleteI suggest citing your references more often. That way, if I want to know where you found something then I can find out. Also, explain the images you use! I see maps of the world that are colored but have no idea what they mean!
Also, I think your intro could do a better job of preparing the reader for what you will discuss. I suggest diving in sooner, and saying straight out: "This website will address the impacts of climate change on malaria and cholera, here is why this is important." As it is now, there is no mention of either of these diseases, but rather you suggest you will handle all infectious disease, which would be much too broad!!!
The text is well laid out and well written, great work! What I would be interested in seeing is a case study of a specific country that has been affected by malarial outbreaks, and perhaps more visuals. This will help to bridge the gap between theoretical and "practical" knowledge.
For your figure, I would look into synthesizing data on malaria with data on cholera and make a prediction what parts of the world will be the worst off under these criteria from climate change.
Thanks,
David